[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <200902170020.15509.oliver@neukum.org>
Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2009 00:20:12 +0100
From: Oliver Neukum <oliver@...kum.org>
To: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>
Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>,
pm list <linux-pm@...ts.linux-foundation.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Arve Hjønnevåg <arve@...roid.com>,
Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>,
Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>,
Nigel Cunningham <nigel@...el.suspend2.net>,
Matthew Garrett <mjg59@...f.ucam.org>,
mark gross <mgross@...ux.intel.com>,
"Woodruff, Richard" <r-woodruff2@...com>,
Uli Luckas <u.luckas@...d.de>,
Igor Stoppa <igor.stoppa@...ia.com>,
Brian Swetland <swetland@...gle.com>,
Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFD] Automatic suspend
Am Monday 16 February 2009 18:31:08 schrieb Arjan van de Ven:
> On Mon, 16 Feb 2009 17:48:06 +0100
> Oliver Neukum <oliver@...kum.org> wrote:
>
> > > Userspace should just be the part that says "I'm interested in link
> > > notifications". The driver then just goes to the lowest power state
> > > for its device that still gives those notifications.
> >
> > Should there be a channel through which drivers can tell user space
> > what the consequences in terms of reaching a sleep state are if a
> > service is requested?
>
> Personally, I don't think so.
> Think about it: what would userspace do?
> Not ask for the functionality if it means no sleep state?
> Maybe it should just never ask for it then as a required functionality!
1. You may have a human being using the information to make the tradeoff.
2. User space may be able to select among several devices the one cheapest
to use
Regards
Oliver
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists