[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090216230104.GG23758@mini-me.lan>
Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2009 18:01:04 -0500
From: Theodore Tso <tytso@....edu>
To: stable@...nel.org
Cc: linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [cebbert@...hat.com: Re: Ext4 tree backports for 2.6.27.13 and
2.6.28.2]
Hi,
Can you please include the patches found in the for-stable and
for-stable-2.6.27 branches at:
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tytso/ext4.git
into the next 2.6.28.y and 2.6.27.y kernels, respectively?
Or do you need me to send them in e-mail format via git
format-patch/git send-email? I can do that too if you prefer that.
- Ted
Return-Path: <cebbert@...hat.com>
Received: from po14.mit.edu ([unix socket])
by po14.mit.edu (Cyrus v2.1.5) with LMTP; Mon, 16 Feb 2009 16:37:49 -0500
X-Sieve: CMU Sieve 2.2
Received: from fort-point-station.mit.edu by po14.mit.edu (8.13.6/4.7) id n1GLbmDm014461; Mon, 16 Feb 2009 16:37:48 -0500 (EST)
Received: from mit.edu (M24-004-BARRACUDA-1.MIT.EDU [18.7.7.111])
by fort-point-station.mit.edu (8.13.6/8.9.2) with ESMTP id n1GLbhLi004836
for <tytso@....edu>; Mon, 16 Feb 2009 16:37:43 -0500 (EST)
Received: from mx2.redhat.com (mx2.redhat.com [66.187.237.31])
by mit.edu (Spam Firewall) with ESMTP id 33E14D647FE
for <tytso@....edu>; Mon, 16 Feb 2009 16:37:41 -0500 (EST)
Received: from int-mx2.corp.redhat.com (int-mx2.corp.redhat.com [172.16.27.26])
by mx2.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id n1GLbe2q016841;
Mon, 16 Feb 2009 16:37:40 -0500
Received: from ns3.rdu.redhat.com (ns3.rdu.redhat.com [10.11.255.199])
by int-mx2.corp.redhat.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id n1GLbeWP020811;
Mon, 16 Feb 2009 16:37:40 -0500
Received: from dhcp-100-2-144.bos.redhat.com (dhcp-100-2-144.bos.redhat.com [10.16.2.144])
by ns3.rdu.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id n1GLbdYC016657;
Mon, 16 Feb 2009 16:37:39 -0500
Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2009 16:35:07 -0500
From: Chuck Ebbert <cebbert@...hat.com>
To: Theodore Tso <tytso@....edu>
Cc: "Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.kumar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Ext4 tree backports for 2.6.27.13 and 2.6.28.2
Message-ID: <20090216163507.1e73f452@...p-100-2-144.bos.redhat.com>
In-Reply-To: <20090212211935.GE6922@...i-me.lan>
References: <E1LT8MN-0003Ps-Ur@...sure.thunk.org>
<20090211075914.GC20842@...walker>
<20090211153328.37ef255f@...p-100-2-144.bos.redhat.com>
<20090212211935.GE6922@...i-me.lan>
Organization: Red Hat, Inc.
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.42
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.58 on 172.16.27.26
X-Spam-Score: 0.00
X-Spam-Flag: NO
On Thu, 12 Feb 2009 16:19:35 -0500
Theodore Tso <tytso@....edu> wrote:
>
> I've updated the for-stable and for-stable-2.6.27 branches against the
> latest stable releases, and I've updated the two flawed backports in
> the for-stable-2.6.27 branch. Could you do a quick double-check and
> make sure the fixes are as you expect, before I send a pull request to
> stable@...nel.org?
The 2.6.27 branch looks good to me.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists