[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090215225427.GH10706@mini-me.lan>
Date: Sun, 15 Feb 2009 17:54:27 -0500
From: Theodore Tso <tytso@....edu>
To: Fernando Luis Vázquez Cao
<fernando@....ntt.co.jp>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
Jeff Garzik <jeff@...zik.org>,
Eric Sandeen <sandeen@...hat.com>, Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>,
Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
Pavel Machek <pavel@...e.cz>,
kernel list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@...cle.com>, fernando@....ac.jp,
Ric Wheeler <rwheeler@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: vfs: Add MS_FLUSHONFSYNC mount flag
On Sun, Feb 15, 2009 at 04:23:26PM +0900, Fernando Luis Vázquez Cao wrote:
> You mentioned "we should integrate this with the barrier settings". Do
> you imply we should make it a per-device tunable too? Should we keep the
> barrier-related mount options some filesystems provide?
>
Making barriers to be a per-device tunable makes sense. The only
reason why we kept it as a mount option in ext4 is for benchmarking
purposes, and in ext3, because the filesystem predated the barrier
code, and there was a desire to be able to benchmark with and without
the old behavior --- and because akpm is still worried about the
performance hit of the barrier code, so he's been resistant about
change the default for ext3.
- Ted
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists