linux-kernel - [2/3] ext3: call block_flush

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 16 Feb 2009 16:29:05 +0900
From:	Fernando Luis Vázquez Cao 
	<fernando@....ntt.co.jp>
To:	Theodore Tso <tytso@....edu>
Cc:	Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>, Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
	Pavel Machek <pavel@...e.cz>,
	kernel list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@...cle.com>, sandeen@...hat.com,
	fernando@....ac.jp, rwheeler@...hat.com,
	linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [2/3] ext3: call  block_flush_device() on fsync

To ensure that bits are truly on-disk after an fsync or fdatasync, we
should force a disk flush explicitly when there is dirty data/metadata
and the journal didn't emit a write barrier (either because metadata is
not being synched or barriers are disabled).

Signed-off-by: Fernando Luis Vazquez Cao <fernando@....ntt.co.jp>
---

diff -urNp linux-2.6.29-rc5-orig/fs/ext3/fsync.c linux-2.6.29-rc5/fs/ext3/fsync.c
--- linux-2.6.29-rc5-orig/fs/ext3/fsync.c	2008-12-25 08:26:37.000000000 +0900
+++ linux-2.6.29-rc5/fs/ext3/fsync.c	2009-02-16 15:56:05.000000000 +0900
@@ -45,6 +45,8 @@
 int ext3_sync_file(struct file * file, struct dentry *dentry, int datasync)
 {
 	struct inode *inode = dentry->d_inode;
+	journal_t *journal = EXT3_SB(inode->i_sb)->s_journal;
+	unsigned long i_state = inode->i_state;
 	int ret = 0;
 
 	J_ASSERT(ext3_journal_current_handle() == NULL);
@@ -69,23 +71,30 @@ int ext3_sync_file(struct file * file, s
 	 */
 	if (ext3_should_journal_data(inode)) {
 		ret = ext3_force_commit(inode->i_sb);
-		goto out;
+		if (!(journal->j_flags & JFS_BARRIER))
+			block_flush_device(inode->i_sb);
+		return ret;
 	}
 
-	if (datasync && !(inode->i_state & I_DIRTY_DATASYNC))
-		goto out;
+	if (datasync && !(i_state & I_DIRTY_DATASYNC)) {
+		if (i_state & I_DIRTY_PAGES)
+			block_flush_device(inode->i_sb);
+		return ret;
+	}
 
 	/*
 	 * The VFS has written the file data.  If the inode is unaltered
 	 * then we need not start a commit.
 	 */
-	if (inode->i_state & (I_DIRTY_SYNC|I_DIRTY_DATASYNC)) {
+	if (i_state & (I_DIRTY_SYNC|I_DIRTY_DATASYNC)) {
 		struct writeback_control wbc = {
 			.sync_mode = WB_SYNC_ALL,
 			.nr_to_write = 0, /* sys_fsync did this */
 		};
 		ret = sync_inode(inode, &wbc);
+		if (journal && !(journal->j_flags & JFS_BARRIER))
+			block_flush_device(inode->i_sb);
 	}
-out:
+
 	return ret;
 }


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/