[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1234865116.4744.46.camel@laptop>
Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2009 11:05:16 +0100
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Nick Piggin <npiggin@...e.de>
Cc: Edward Shishkin <edward.shishkin@...il.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Ryan Hope <rmh3093@...il.com>,
Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@...cle.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
ReiserFS Mailing List <reiserfs-devel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [patch 2/4] vfs: add set_page_dirty_notag
On Tue, 2009-02-17 at 10:38 +0100, Nick Piggin wrote:
> It is a great shame that filesystems are not properly notified
> that a page may become dirty before the actual set_page_dirty
> event (which is not allowed to fail and is called after the
> page is already dirty).
Not quite true, for example the set_page_dirty() done by the write fault
code is done _before_ the page becomes dirty.
This before/after thing was the reason for that horrid file corruption
bug that dragged on for a few weeks back in .19 (IIRC).
> This is a big problem I have with fsblock simply in trying to
> make the memory allocation robust. page_mkwrite unfortunately
> is racy and I've fixed problems there... the big problem though
> is get_user_pages. Fixing that properly seems to require fixing
> callers so it is not really realistic in the short term.
Right, I'm just not sure what we can do, even with a
prepage_page_dirty() function, what are you going to do, fail the fault?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists