[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.1.10.0902170743520.910@gandalf.stny.rr.com>
Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2009 07:45:52 -0500 (EST)
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...hat.com>,
Steven Rostedt <srostedt@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 12/15] ftrace: add traceon traceoff commands to enable/disable
the buffers
On Tue, 17 Feb 2009, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>
> * Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org> wrote:
>
> > + if (*count != -1)
> > + (*count)--;
>
> minor nit: it's a tiny bit more compact as:
>
> > + if (*count != -1)
> > + --*count;
Doesn't that move the pointer? Cases like these, I prefer the parenthesis,
because I get confused about C ordering.
>
> and this:
>
> > return register_tracer(&function_trace);
> > }
> >
> > device_initcall(init_function_trace);
> > +
>
> there should be no newline between device_initcall() and the
> preceding function. (we can think of it as a late attribute of
> the function, attached to the function. We do the same for
> EXPORT_SYMBOL's too, etc.)
OK,
Do you want me to rebase, or just send out new "clean up" patches?
-- Steve
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists