[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090217135833.GB25029@sirena.org.uk>
Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2009 13:58:34 +0000
From: Mark Brown <broonie@...ena.org.uk>
To: Matthew Garrett <mjg59@...f.ucam.org>
Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>,
Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>,
"Woodruff, Richard" <r-woodruff2@...com>,
Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>,
Kyle Moffett <kyle@...fetthome.net>,
Oliver Neukum <oliver@...kum.org>,
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
pm list <linux-pm@...ts.linux-foundation.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Arve Hj?nnev?g <arve@...roid.com>, Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>,
Nigel Cunningham <nigel@...el.suspend2.net>,
mark gross <mgross@...ux.intel.com>,
Uli Luckas <u.luckas@...d.de>,
Igor Stoppa <igor.stoppa@...ia.com>,
Brian Swetland <swetland@...gle.com>,
Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFD] Automatic suspend
On Mon, Feb 16, 2009 at 11:23:30PM +0000, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> Arve said that the power state was equivalent in idle and suspend, but
> that they preferred suspend because it stopped any periodic timers. I'd
> be more interested in making sure that unnecessary timers aren't running
> than focusing on automatically entering system-wide suspend - Nokia have
> been managing this since 2005 with good results.
Definitely. Even in the embedded case there is hardware which takes a
relatively long time to fully power down and resume without winning an
enormous amount on the power front (analogue stuff is a common culprit
here, it can take a noticable amount of time to bring it up cleanly).
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists