[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090217141924.GA25335@srcf.ucam.org>
Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2009 14:19:24 +0000
From: Matthew Garrett <mjg59@...f.ucam.org>
To: Brian Swetland <swetland@...gle.com>
Cc: Pavel Machek <pavel@...e.cz>, "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>,
pm list <linux-pm@...ts.linux-foundation.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Arve Hj?nnev?g <arve@...roid.com>,
Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>,
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
Nigel Cunningham <nigel@...el.suspend2.net>,
mark gross <mgross@...ux.intel.com>,
"Woodruff, Richard" <r-woodruff2@...com>,
Uli Luckas <u.luckas@...d.de>,
Igor Stoppa <igor.stoppa@...ia.com>,
Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFD] Automatic suspend
On Tue, Feb 17, 2009 at 06:14:34AM -0800, Brian Swetland wrote:
> [Matthew Garrett <mjg59@...f.ucam.org>]
> > https://lists.linux-foundation.org/pipermail/linux-pm/2009-January/019493.html
> > says that they're the same on their current platform.
>
> Well on the Qualcomm MSM72xx SoCs, yeah they're pretty similar -- we can
> reasonably enter power collapse (full shutdown of the ARM11 and
> peripherals) from idle. But this is not (to my knowledge) true of *all*
> SoCs out there. Also, resuming from this state can take 5-30ms
> (depending on how distracted the baseband processor is by what's going
> on on the network).
Mm. Resume from deep idle on x86 is typically in the usec range, but
this is the kind of constraint that pm_qos exposes nicely.
--
Matthew Garrett | mjg59@...f.ucam.org
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists