[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090217151156.GC6761@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2009 07:11:56 -0800
From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Damien Wyart <damien.wyart@...e.fr>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
Mike Galbraith <efault@....de>,
Frédéric Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Kernel Testers List <kernel-testers@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [Bug #12650] Strange load average and ksoftirqd behavior with
2.6.29-rc2-git1
On Tue, Feb 17, 2009 at 07:11:42AM +0100, Damien Wyart wrote:
> * Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com> [2009-02-16 14:39]:
> > What is the easiest way for me to make it easy to trace the return path
> > from __rcu_pending()? Make each return path call an empty function
> > located off where the compiler cannot see it, I guess... Diagnostic
> > patch along these lines below. Frederic, Damien, could you please give
> > it a go? (And of course please let me know if something else is
> > needed.)
>
> As Frederic already sent a trace (made with another method), I'll
> consider for now mine would not be very useful at this stage, so I'm
> waiting for further instructions.
>
> If you need further testing for me, do not hesitate to ask...
I would be very interested to hear whether or not my patch removing
rcu_pending() and rcu_check_callbacks() from the x86_32 idle loop
fixes the problem for you.
Thanx, Paul
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists