[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.1.10.0902171207100.910@gandalf.stny.rr.com>
Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2009 12:09:21 -0500 (EST)
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
cc: Sam Ravnborg <sam@...nborg.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...hat.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
"Luis Claudio R. Goncalves" <lclaudio@...g.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/15] [git pull] for tip/tracing/ftrace
On Tue, 17 Feb 2009, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>
> Small naming detail: instead of calling it a 'hook' (which
> really has a bad sound to it for various reasons), how about
> calling it a 'trigger' and/or a 'callback'?
I started converting the names from hook to trigger, and the name looks
funny to me. I asked on IRC for opinions and Luis suggested "_probe". I
think I like that idea.
Ingo, do you agree that "_probe" would be a good substitute for "_hook"?
-- Steve
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists