[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.1.10.0902171224050.910@gandalf.stny.rr.com>
Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2009 12:24:34 -0500 (EST)
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...ymtl.ca>
cc: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...hat.com>,
Nick Piggin <npiggin@...e.de>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
akpm <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli <ananth@...ibm.com>,
Jim Keniston <jkenisto@...ibm.com>
Subject: Re: irq-disabled vs vmap vs text_poke
On Tue, 17 Feb 2009, Mathieu Desnoyers wrote:
> >
>
> Anyway dynamic ftrace only need to do code patching at early boot,
> right? Or do you need also to patch the call sites a bit later too ?
> Because there is a text_poke_early for that purpose : modifying code
> when it is still writable.
It modifies the code both at early boot up, and when it is enabled later
on at run time.
-- Steve
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists