[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1234892764.4744.159.camel@laptop>
Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2009 18:46:04 +0100
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Nick Piggin <npiggin@...e.de>,
Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@...cle.com>,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] generic-smp: remove kmalloc()
On Tue, 2009-02-17 at 18:40 +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > What do you think?
>
> While I would say, don't do that to your deadlock scenario, I do like
> the extra freedom this provides, so I'm inclined to go with this. Let me
> spin a new patch and build a kernel with it ;-)
Should we do the same for the _single case? It too can copy the csd data
into the stack and return before calling func.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists