[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090217200127.GA30981@rhlx01.hs-esslingen.de>
Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2009 21:01:27 +0100
From: Andreas Mohr <andi@...as.de>
To: Mikael Pettersson <mikpe@...uu.se>
Cc: Andreas Mohr <andi@...as.de>, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-ide@...r.kernel.org, Tejun Heo <htejun@...il.com>,
Sergei Shtylyov <sshtylyov@...mvista.com>,
WimVanSebroeck@...x01.hs-esslingen.de
Subject: Re: [BUG] 2.6.29-rc2-git1 to -rc5: libata lockup on boot, LED
solid, 100% CPU
<wim@...ana.be>
Bcc:
Subject: Re: [BUG] 2.6.29-rc2-git1 to -rc5: libata lockup on boot, LED
solid, 100% CPU
Reply-To:
In-Reply-To: <18841.54304.460011.351580@...po.it.uu.se>
X-Priority: none
[CC'd Sergei and Wim; thanks a lot for your work!]
Hi,
On Mon, Feb 16, 2009 at 10:01:20PM +0100, Mikael Pettersson wrote:
> Andreas Mohr writes:
> > Should I test 2.6.28.5? Every build will take two hours though...
> > Not ATA-SFF 32bit bug problem, right? (already committed?)
> > http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123254501314058&w=2
>
> To me it looks like the 32-bit PIO bug. The patch you cited above was
> just the first to identify the issue. This is still unfixed in 29-rc5.
> Please test Sergei's latest proposed patch posted yesterday to linux-ide.
Bingo. That patch ( http://marc.info/?l=linux-ide&m=123482861218381&w=2 )
made -rc5 boot for me. Well, after additionally disabling iTCO_wdt.ko,
that is... (on my Dell Inspiron 8000 i810)
And HDD did seem to be a wee bit more reponsive, too, but that could be
mere illusion...
Thanks,
Andreas Mohr
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists