linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH -v4] generic-ipi: remove kmalloc()

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20090217204436.GA10050@redhat.com>
Date:	Tue, 17 Feb 2009 21:44:36 +0100
From:	Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
To:	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc:	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Nick Piggin <npiggin@...e.de>,
	Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@...cle.com>,
	"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
	Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>,
	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH -v4] generic-ipi: remove kmalloc()

On 02/17, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
>
> On Tue, 2009-02-17 at 21:11 +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> >
> > > As for the previous version. I am almost sure I missed something
> > > again, but do we really need both CSD_FLAG_WAIT and CSD_FLAG_LOCK
> > > flags? smp_call_function_many(wait => 1) can just wait for
> > > !CSD_FLAG_LOCK.
> >
> > I suppose we can.
>
> Ah, no, that would mean we cannot distinguish between the sync and async
> case in generic_exec_single().

Yes, generic_exec_single() needs the "bool wait" argument, it can't
use (data->flags & CSD_SINGLE_FLAG) as "should we wait or not".

In any case, even if this change is worthwhile it needs a separate
patch, please forget for now.

Oleg.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/