[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <86802c440902171258t6f542624ge679c861c4bb3023@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2009 12:58:21 -0800
From: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org>
To: Andreas Herrmann <andreas.herrmann3@....com>
Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/7] x86: memtest: introduce array to store memtest
patterns
On Tue, Feb 17, 2009 at 2:24 AM, Andreas Herrmann
<andreas.herrmann3@....com> wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 13, 2009 at 09:52:31AM -0800, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
>> Andreas Herrmann wrote:
>> > -#define _MAX_MEM_PATTERNS 4
>> > +static unsigned long patterns[] = {
>> > + 0UL,
>> > + -1UL,
>> > +#ifdef CONFIG_X86_64
>> > + 0x5555555555555555UL,
>> > + 0xaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaUL,
>> > +#else
>> > + 0x55555555UL,
>> > + 0xaaaaaaaaUL,
>> > +#endif
>> > +};
>>
>> Why not just use u64 for the pattern even on 32 bits?
>
> I just assumed that this was a settled thing.
>
> Yinghai, was there a specific reason why you did not use an u64 for
> the memory test pattern on 32-bit?
> (See commit 1f067167a83d1c7f80437fd1d32b55508aaca009 "x86: seperate
> memtest from init_64.c")
>
> If not I'll adapt this and send out a new patch set.
should be ok, but please make sure target range is u64 alignment.
YH
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists