linux-kernel - Re: 2.6.29-rc4 regression

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <499B3271.6020306@klingt.org>
Date:	Tue, 17 Feb 2009 22:56:01 +0100
From:	Tim Blechmann <tim@...ngt.org>
To:	Mike Galbraith <efault@....de>
CC:	Robert Richter <robert.richter@....com>,
	oprofile-list@...ts.sf.net, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: 2.6.29-rc4 regression

>> hm, i just tried to compile 2.6.28 with this patch applied, and there
>> the NMIs are delivered correctly.
>>
>>> Thanks Tim, on later kernels, is it the behaviour you mentioned that
>>> no NMIs are delivered and you do not receive any NMI?
>> on the current 2.6.29-rc5, no NMIs are delivered. however i have also
>> applied the performance counter branch from tip, maybe that interferes
>> with oprofile?
> 
> Hm.
> 
> If you're using latest tip, there _should_ be no interference.  There
> was a problem a short while back in that both perfcounters and oprofile
> register die handlers, but that was resolved by increasing oprofile's
> handler priority, so that it takes over NMI handling while profiling.

well, it seems to be a perfcounters vs. oprofile issue. when i applied
the patch i posted earlier onto vanilla 2.6.29-rc5, NMIs were delivered ...

best, tim

-- 
tim@...ngt.org
http://tim.klingt.org

The composer makes plans, music laughs.
  Morton Feldman


Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (198 bytes)