linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] acpi: add some missing section markers

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <499B7F74.2000105@goop.org>
Date:	Tue, 17 Feb 2009 19:24:36 -0800
From:	Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@...p.org>
To:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
CC:	"Brown, Len" <len.brown@...el.com>,
	Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] acpi: add some missing section markers

Ingo Molnar wrote:
> * Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@...p.org> wrote:
>
>   
>> early_acpi_os_unmap_memory() is an __init function, and 
>> acpi_os_unmap_memory() is allowed to access an __init function 
>> until acpi_gbl_permanent_mmap is set up.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy.fitzhardinge@...rix.com>
>>     
>
> Note, this is modified by tip:x86/acpi, so if Len applies it to 
> the ACPI tree we'll generate conflicts. Since the problem itself 
> has been generated by the 6 commits in tip:x86/acpi, if Len is 
> fine with it i'd like to apply your fix there.

Sorry, I'd forgotten what path those patches were taking;  I just 
blindly applied the "ACPI=Len" pattern.

    J
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/