[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.1.10.0902172243550.1360@gandalf.stny.rr.com>
Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2009 22:48:33 -0500 (EST)
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
Geoff Levand <geoffrey.levand@...sony.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Steven Rostedt <srostedt@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/7] tracing/function-graph-tracer: make arch generic
push pop functions
On Wed, 18 Feb 2009, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>
> * Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org> wrote:
>
> > Ingo,
> >
> > This patch is to make function graph arch generic. But since
> > the PowerPC changes depend on it, we want to push it through
> > the PowerPC tree. But since it touches x86 code, can you give
> > an Acked-by to it?
>
> hm, but it's all ftrace bits. Could this go through the tracing
> tree? That's how it's generally done for most cross-arch
> subsystems. By having it in a separate tree we risk conflicts
> and various logistics problems. It's not like the PPC tree is
> modifying its ftrace.c file all that frequently, right?
Ingo,
How about this. We could incorporate some of the power of git. I could
make a separate branch based off of Linus's 2.6.29-rc5 announcement, and
apply just this patch (the ftrace generic and x86 change). If you give me
your Acked-by, I'll add that too.
This way, both you and Ben could pull from this branch to get the one
change. When it goes upstream, because it has the same SHA1, git could
easily resolve it.
-- Steve
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists