lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Tue, 17 Feb 2009 23:19:16 -0800
From:	Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>
To:	Yu Zhao <yu.zhao@...el.com>
Cc:	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 6/7] PCI: document SR-IOV sysfs entries

On Wed, Feb 18, 2009 at 01:01:35AM +0800, Yu Zhao wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 18, 2009 at 02:21:16PM +0800, Greg KH wrote:
> > On Tue, Feb 17, 2009 at 10:43:03PM +0800, Yu Zhao wrote:
> > > On Wed, Feb 18, 2009 at 11:49:10AM +0800, Greg KH wrote:
> > > > On Tue, Feb 17, 2009 at 08:50:21PM +0800, Yu Zhao wrote:
> > > > > I'd like to create a subdirectory under PCI device sysfs directory and
> > > > > put some symbol links into that directory (only symbol links). Should I
> > > > > use `device' or `kobject'? Currently I use `device' and get two extra
> > > > > file/directory (uevent and power) which look like useless for my case
> > > > > because this subdirectory doesn't reflect a real device.
> > > > 
> > > > Neither, just use an attribute group, no new struct device should be
> > > > needed at all.
> > > 
> > > Yes, I was thinking using an attribute group, however, it looks like we
> > > can't put symbol link into a group. Maybe I'm wrong, shed some light,
> > > please?
> > 
> > Why would you want a symbolic link in an attribute group?
> 
> Sorry I didn't make myself clear. I'd like to create a subdirectory (its
> parent is controlled by a `struct device') to only hold symbol links.

Ick.  What would those links be to?  And what are they for?

> Can I use an `attribute group' of the parent `struct device' for this,
> or a child `struct device', or a bare `struct kobject'?

You can't use an attribute group for symlinks.
You should use a struct device, but be careful, you are going to be
creating uevents that I don't think you really want to.

Care to describe what you are trying to do first?

thanks,

greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ