[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <200902180953.51171.oliver@neukum.org>
Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2009 09:53:48 +0100
From: Oliver Neukum <oliver@...kum.org>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>
Cc: Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>,
Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>,
pm list <linux-pm@...ts.linux-foundation.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Arve Hjønnevåg <arve@...roid.com>,
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>,
Nigel Cunningham <nigel@...el.suspend2.net>,
Matthew Garrett <mjg59@...f.ucam.org>,
mark gross <mgross@...ux.intel.com>,
"Woodruff, Richard" <r-woodruff2@...com>,
Uli Luckas <u.luckas@...d.de>,
Igor Stoppa <igor.stoppa@...ia.com>,
Brian Swetland <swetland@...gle.com>,
Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFD] Automatic suspend
Am Wednesday 18 February 2009 00:26:53 schrieb Rafael J. Wysocki:
> > Another possibility is to set up independent runtime PM for the
> > transport and the device. This means allowing the possibility that the
> > transport is suspended while its child (the device) is not. This is a
> > little simpler (there's only one idle-timeout per device, since the
> > link is treated as an independent device), but it violates the
> > principle of never suspending a parent while there is an active child.
>
> Well, I think the first approach would be better.
I am afraid it wouldn't be. How do you deal with shared transports?
Regards
Oliver
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists