linux-kernel - Re: mmotm 2009-02-17-12-33 uploaded

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20090218015356.4454f758.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Date:	Wed, 18 Feb 2009 01:53:56 -0800
From:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To:	Jiri Slaby <jirislaby@...il.com>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, tglx@...utronix.de,
	x86@...nel.org, oleg@...hat.com,
	Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>
Subject: Re: mmotm 2009-02-17-12-33 uploaded

On Wed, 18 Feb 2009 10:35:23 +0100 Jiri Slaby <jirislaby@...il.com> wrote:

> On 18.2.2009 10:19, Jiri Slaby wrote:
> > On 18.2.2009 00:21, Jiri Slaby wrote:
> >> On 17.2.2009 21:33, akpm@...ux-foundation.org wrote:
> >>> The mm-of-the-moment snapshot 2009-02-17-12-33 has been uploaded to
> >
> > This one:
> > kthreads-move-sched-realeted-initialization-from-kthreadd-context.patch
> 
> This hunk fixes the problem for me. I have no idea if it is correct though.
> 
> diff --git a/kernel/kthread.c b/kernel/kthread.c
> index c1c3763..caed471 100644
> --- a/kernel/kthread.c
> +++ b/kernel/kthread.c
> @@ -73,6 +73,7 @@ static int kthread(void *_create)
> 
>          /* OK, tell user we're spawned, wait for stop or wakeup */
>          __set_current_state(TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE);
> +       create->result = current;
>          complete(&create->done);
>          schedule();

hm, it does seem to forget to initialise ->result on the success path.

Someone else has been mucking with kthread.c in linux-next, and a
couple of days ago that mucking got dropped from linux-next.  Perhaps
this churn broke Oleg's patch.

And if it was Stephen who dropped the offending tree, that mucking
about will come back soon and will re-muck things up.

<checks>

	Undropped tree:
		rr

And what does that do?  yup,

--- a/kernel/kthread.c
+++ b/kernel/kthread.c
@@ -76,6 +76,7 @@ static int kthread(void *_create)
 
 	/* OK, tell user we're spawned, wait for stop or wakeup */
 	__set_current_state(TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE);
+	create->result = current;
 	complete(&create->started);
 	schedule();
 

guys, please stop mucking things up?

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/