linux-kernel - Re: CFQ is worse than other IO schedulers in some cases

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <1234956951.5610.6.camel@marge.simson.net>
Date:	Wed, 18 Feb 2009 12:35:51 +0100
From:	Mike Galbraith <efault@....de>
To:	Shan Wei <shanwei@...fujitsu.com>
Cc:	jens.axboe@...cle.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: CFQ is worse than other IO schedulers in some cases

On Wed, 2009-02-18 at 18:15 +0800, Shan Wei wrote:

> Can you confirm the dump command on your box?

I don't have dump installed.  BTW, kernel was 2.6.28.5.

	-Mike

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/