[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090218120508.GB4100@elte.hu>
Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2009 13:05:08 +0100
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To: Patrick McHardy <kaber@...sh.net>, Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
Cc: Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@...tta.com>,
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
Rick Jones <rick.jones2@...com>,
Eric Dumazet <dada1@...mosbay.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
netfilter-devel@...r.kernel.org, tglx@...utronix.de,
Martin Josefsson <gandalf@...g.westbo.se>
Subject: [patch] timers: add mod_timer_pending()
* Patrick McHardy <kaber@...sh.net> wrote:
> Ingo Molnar wrote:
>>> -extern int __mod_timer(struct timer_list *timer, unsigned long expires);
>>> +extern int __mod_timer(struct timer_list *timer, unsigned long expires, int activate);
>>
>> This is not really acceptable, it slows down every single add_timer()
>> and mod_timer() call in the kernel with a flag that has one specific
>> value in all but your case. There's more than 2000 such callsites in
>> the kernel.
>>
>> Why dont you use something like this instead:
>>
>> if (del_timer(timer))
>> add_timer(timer);
>
> We need to avoid having a timer that was deleted by one CPU
> getting re-added by another, but want to avoid taking the
> conntrack lock for every timer update. The timer-internal
> locking is enough for this as long as we have a mod_timer
> variant that forwards a timer, but doesn't activate it in
> case it isn't active already.
that makes sense - but the implementation is still somewhat
ugly. How about the one below instead? Not tested.
One open question is this construct in mod_timer():
+ /*
+ * This is a common optimization triggered by the
+ * networking code - if the timer is re-modified
+ * to be the same thing then just return:
+ */
+ if (timer->expires == expires && timer_pending(timer))
+ return 1;
We've had this for ages, but it seems rather SMP-unsafe.
timer_pending(), if used in an unserialized fashion, can be any
random value in theory - there's no internal serialization here
anywhere.
We could end up with incorrectly not re-activating a timer in
mod_timer() for example - have such things never been observed
in practice?
So the original patch which added this to mod_timer_noact() was
racy i think, and we cannot preserve this optimization outside
of the timer list lock. (we could do it inside of it.)
Ingo
------------------->
Subject: timers: add mod_timer_pending()
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2009 12:23:29 +0100
Impact: new timer API
Based on an idea from Stephen Hemminger: introduce
mod_timer_pending() which is a mod_timer() offspring
that is an invariant on already removed timers.
(regular mod_timer() re-activates non-pending timers.)
This is useful for the networking code in that it can
allow unserialized mod_timer_pending() timer-forwarding
calls, but a single del_timer*() will stop the timer
from being reactivated again.
Also while at it:
- optimize the regular mod_timer() path some more, the
timer-stat and a debug check was needlessly duplicated
in __mod_timer().
- make the exports come straight after the function, as
most other exports in timer.c already did.
- eliminate __mod_timer() as an external API, change the
users to mod_timer().
The regular mod_timer() code path is not impacted
significantly, due to inlining optimizations and due to
the simplifications - but performance testing would be nice
nevertheless.
Based-on-patch-from: Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@...tta.com>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
---
arch/powerpc/platforms/cell/spufs/sched.c | 2
drivers/infiniband/hw/ipath/ipath_driver.c | 6 -
include/linux/timer.h | 22 -----
kernel/relay.c | 2
kernel/timer.c | 110 +++++++++++++++++++----------
5 files changed, 80 insertions(+), 62 deletions(-)
Index: linux/arch/powerpc/platforms/cell/spufs/sched.c
===================================================================
--- linux.orig/arch/powerpc/platforms/cell/spufs/sched.c
+++ linux/arch/powerpc/platforms/cell/spufs/sched.c
@@ -508,7 +508,7 @@ static void __spu_add_to_rq(struct spu_c
list_add_tail(&ctx->rq, &spu_prio->runq[ctx->prio]);
set_bit(ctx->prio, spu_prio->bitmap);
if (!spu_prio->nr_waiting++)
- __mod_timer(&spusched_timer, jiffies + SPUSCHED_TICK);
+ mod_timer(&spusched_timer, jiffies + SPUSCHED_TICK);
}
}
Index: linux/drivers/infiniband/hw/ipath/ipath_driver.c
===================================================================
--- linux.orig/drivers/infiniband/hw/ipath/ipath_driver.c
+++ linux/drivers/infiniband/hw/ipath/ipath_driver.c
@@ -2715,7 +2715,7 @@ static void ipath_hol_signal_up(struct i
* to prevent HoL blocking, then start the HoL timer that
* periodically continues, then stop procs, so they can detect
* link down if they want, and do something about it.
- * Timer may already be running, so use __mod_timer, not add_timer.
+ * Timer may already be running, so use mod_timer, not add_timer.
*/
void ipath_hol_down(struct ipath_devdata *dd)
{
@@ -2724,7 +2724,7 @@ void ipath_hol_down(struct ipath_devdata
dd->ipath_hol_next = IPATH_HOL_DOWNCONT;
dd->ipath_hol_timer.expires = jiffies +
msecs_to_jiffies(ipath_hol_timeout_ms);
- __mod_timer(&dd->ipath_hol_timer, dd->ipath_hol_timer.expires);
+ mod_timer(&dd->ipath_hol_timer, dd->ipath_hol_timer.expires);
}
/*
@@ -2763,7 +2763,7 @@ void ipath_hol_event(unsigned long opaqu
else {
dd->ipath_hol_timer.expires = jiffies +
msecs_to_jiffies(ipath_hol_timeout_ms);
- __mod_timer(&dd->ipath_hol_timer,
+ mod_timer(&dd->ipath_hol_timer,
dd->ipath_hol_timer.expires);
}
}
Index: linux/include/linux/timer.h
===================================================================
--- linux.orig/include/linux/timer.h
+++ linux/include/linux/timer.h
@@ -161,8 +161,8 @@ static inline int timer_pending(const st
extern void add_timer_on(struct timer_list *timer, int cpu);
extern int del_timer(struct timer_list * timer);
-extern int __mod_timer(struct timer_list *timer, unsigned long expires);
extern int mod_timer(struct timer_list *timer, unsigned long expires);
+extern int mod_timer_pending(struct timer_list *timer, unsigned long expires);
/*
* The jiffies value which is added to now, when there is no timer
@@ -221,25 +221,7 @@ static inline void timer_stats_timer_cle
}
#endif
-/**
- * add_timer - start a timer
- * @timer: the timer to be added
- *
- * The kernel will do a ->function(->data) callback from the
- * timer interrupt at the ->expires point in the future. The
- * current time is 'jiffies'.
- *
- * The timer's ->expires, ->function (and if the handler uses it, ->data)
- * fields must be set prior calling this function.
- *
- * Timers with an ->expires field in the past will be executed in the next
- * timer tick.
- */
-static inline void add_timer(struct timer_list *timer)
-{
- BUG_ON(timer_pending(timer));
- __mod_timer(timer, timer->expires);
-}
+extern void add_timer(struct timer_list *timer);
#ifdef CONFIG_SMP
extern int try_to_del_timer_sync(struct timer_list *timer);
Index: linux/kernel/relay.c
===================================================================
--- linux.orig/kernel/relay.c
+++ linux/kernel/relay.c
@@ -748,7 +748,7 @@ size_t relay_switch_subbuf(struct rchan_
* from the scheduler (trying to re-grab
* rq->lock), so defer it.
*/
- __mod_timer(&buf->timer, jiffies + 1);
+ mod_timer(&buf->timer, jiffies + 1);
}
old = buf->data;
Index: linux/kernel/timer.c
===================================================================
--- linux.orig/kernel/timer.c
+++ linux/kernel/timer.c
@@ -600,11 +600,14 @@ static struct tvec_base *lock_timer_base
}
}
-int __mod_timer(struct timer_list *timer, unsigned long expires)
+static inline int
+__mod_timer(struct timer_list *timer, unsigned long expires, bool pending_only)
{
struct tvec_base *base, *new_base;
unsigned long flags;
- int ret = 0;
+ int ret;
+
+ ret = 0;
timer_stats_timer_set_start_info(timer);
BUG_ON(!timer->function);
@@ -614,6 +617,9 @@ int __mod_timer(struct timer_list *timer
if (timer_pending(timer)) {
detach_timer(timer, 0);
ret = 1;
+ } else {
+ if (pending_only)
+ goto out_unlock;
}
debug_timer_activate(timer);
@@ -640,42 +646,28 @@ int __mod_timer(struct timer_list *timer
timer->expires = expires;
internal_add_timer(base, timer);
+
+out_unlock:
spin_unlock_irqrestore(&base->lock, flags);
return ret;
}
-EXPORT_SYMBOL(__mod_timer);
-
/**
- * add_timer_on - start a timer on a particular CPU
- * @timer: the timer to be added
- * @cpu: the CPU to start it on
+ * mod_timer_pending - modify a pending timer's timeout
+ * @timer: the pending timer to be modified
+ * @expires: new timeout in jiffies
*
- * This is not very scalable on SMP. Double adds are not possible.
+ * mod_timer_pending() is the same for pending timers as mod_timer(),
+ * but will not re-activate and modify already deleted timers.
+ *
+ * It is useful for unserialized use of timers.
*/
-void add_timer_on(struct timer_list *timer, int cpu)
+int mod_timer_pending(struct timer_list *timer, unsigned long expires)
{
- struct tvec_base *base = per_cpu(tvec_bases, cpu);
- unsigned long flags;
-
- timer_stats_timer_set_start_info(timer);
- BUG_ON(timer_pending(timer) || !timer->function);
- spin_lock_irqsave(&base->lock, flags);
- timer_set_base(timer, base);
- debug_timer_activate(timer);
- internal_add_timer(base, timer);
- /*
- * Check whether the other CPU is idle and needs to be
- * triggered to reevaluate the timer wheel when nohz is
- * active. We are protected against the other CPU fiddling
- * with the timer by holding the timer base lock. This also
- * makes sure that a CPU on the way to idle can not evaluate
- * the timer wheel.
- */
- wake_up_idle_cpu(cpu);
- spin_unlock_irqrestore(&base->lock, flags);
+ return __mod_timer(timer, expires, true);
}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL(mod_timer_pending);
/**
* mod_timer - modify a timer's timeout
@@ -699,9 +691,6 @@ void add_timer_on(struct timer_list *tim
*/
int mod_timer(struct timer_list *timer, unsigned long expires)
{
- BUG_ON(!timer->function);
-
- timer_stats_timer_set_start_info(timer);
/*
* This is a common optimization triggered by the
* networking code - if the timer is re-modified
@@ -710,12 +699,62 @@ int mod_timer(struct timer_list *timer,
if (timer->expires == expires && timer_pending(timer))
return 1;
- return __mod_timer(timer, expires);
+ return __mod_timer(timer, expires, false);
}
-
EXPORT_SYMBOL(mod_timer);
/**
+ * add_timer - start a timer
+ * @timer: the timer to be added
+ *
+ * The kernel will do a ->function(->data) callback from the
+ * timer interrupt at the ->expires point in the future. The
+ * current time is 'jiffies'.
+ *
+ * The timer's ->expires, ->function (and if the handler uses it, ->data)
+ * fields must be set prior calling this function.
+ *
+ * Timers with an ->expires field in the past will be executed in the next
+ * timer tick.
+ */
+void add_timer(struct timer_list *timer)
+{
+ BUG_ON(timer_pending(timer));
+ mod_timer(timer, timer->expires);
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL(add_timer);
+
+/**
+ * add_timer_on - start a timer on a particular CPU
+ * @timer: the timer to be added
+ * @cpu: the CPU to start it on
+ *
+ * This is not very scalable on SMP. Double adds are not possible.
+ */
+void add_timer_on(struct timer_list *timer, int cpu)
+{
+ struct tvec_base *base = per_cpu(tvec_bases, cpu);
+ unsigned long flags;
+
+ timer_stats_timer_set_start_info(timer);
+ BUG_ON(timer_pending(timer) || !timer->function);
+ spin_lock_irqsave(&base->lock, flags);
+ timer_set_base(timer, base);
+ debug_timer_activate(timer);
+ internal_add_timer(base, timer);
+ /*
+ * Check whether the other CPU is idle and needs to be
+ * triggered to reevaluate the timer wheel when nohz is
+ * active. We are protected against the other CPU fiddling
+ * with the timer by holding the timer base lock. This also
+ * makes sure that a CPU on the way to idle can not evaluate
+ * the timer wheel.
+ */
+ wake_up_idle_cpu(cpu);
+ spin_unlock_irqrestore(&base->lock, flags);
+}
+
+/**
* del_timer - deactive a timer.
* @timer: the timer to be deactivated
*
@@ -744,7 +783,6 @@ int del_timer(struct timer_list *timer)
return ret;
}
-
EXPORT_SYMBOL(del_timer);
#ifdef CONFIG_SMP
@@ -778,7 +816,6 @@ out:
return ret;
}
-
EXPORT_SYMBOL(try_to_del_timer_sync);
/**
@@ -816,7 +853,6 @@ int del_timer_sync(struct timer_list *ti
cpu_relax();
}
}
-
EXPORT_SYMBOL(del_timer_sync);
#endif
@@ -1314,7 +1350,7 @@ signed long __sched schedule_timeout(sig
expire = timeout + jiffies;
setup_timer_on_stack(&timer, process_timeout, (unsigned long)current);
- __mod_timer(&timer, expire);
+ __mod_timer(&timer, expire, false);
schedule();
del_singleshot_timer_sync(&timer);
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists