[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <200902181005.24952.paul.moore@hp.com>
Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2009 10:05:24 -0500
From: Paul Moore <paul.moore@...com>
To: etienne <etienne.basset@...ericable.fr>
Cc: Casey Schaufler <casey@...aufler-ca.com>,
"Linux-Kernel" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] SMACK netfilter smacklabel socket match
On Wednesday 18 February 2009 02:23:24 am etienne wrote:
> ... anyway, I think the cleanest way would be to, well, sort smk_netlbladdr
> by mask on insertion (perf doesn't matter here) and this way
> smack_host_label can stop the loop on first match. Plus, it would give a
> nicer /smack/netlabel ouptut :)
Agreed.
> so, how should we handle it? apply the patches (with whitespaces damages
> corrected ;) ) now (as it corrects a bug) an elaborate the cleaner way
> later?
Well, since you have some time and willingness to do things "the right way" I
would recommend dropping these patches (which are really just band-aids) and
working on the right solution to stored the addresses/masks in a sorted list
with the mask already applied.
FWIW, the NetLabel code (net/netlabel) has to do very similar things with
sorted address lists so I built an address list construct which builds on the
list.h ideas and operates in a similar way. You may find it helpful.
> I think this should go to stable too?
I would worry about getting the patches developed, tested and in an acceptable
form first, then we can worry about where they should be applied ;)
--
paul moore
linux @ hp
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists