[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <200902181810.03679.oliver@neukum.org>
Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2009 18:10:01 +0100
From: Oliver Neukum <oliver@...kum.org>
To: Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>
Cc: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>,
pm list <linux-pm@...ts.linux-foundation.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Arve Hjønnevåg <arve@...roid.com>,
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>,
Nigel Cunningham <nigel@...el.suspend2.net>,
Matthew Garrett <mjg59@...f.ucam.org>,
mark gross <mgross@...ux.intel.com>,
"Woodruff, Richard" <r-woodruff2@...com>,
Uli Luckas <u.luckas@...d.de>,
Igor Stoppa <igor.stoppa@...ia.com>,
Brian Swetland <swetland@...gle.com>,
Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFD] Automatic suspend
Am Wednesday 18 February 2009 17:39:21 schrieb Alan Stern:
> In essence what you're saying is that we won't be able to do
> link-suspend for HID until something like HID transport classes (or
> something simpler, devoted specifically to runtime PM) is implemented.
> And likewise for other subsystems. I can't argue with this conclusion.
I'd say, if it has sensible operations, it is a device and should be in the
tree as such.
Regards
Oliver
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists