[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090218175244.GA19235@srcf.ucam.org>
Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2009 17:52:44 +0000
From: Matthew Garrett <mjg59@...f.ucam.org>
To: Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@...tuousgeek.org>
Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
Brian Swetland <swetland@...gle.com>,
Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>,
"Woodruff, Richard" <r-woodruff2@...com>,
Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>,
Kyle Moffett <kyle@...fetthome.net>,
Oliver Neukum <oliver@...kum.org>,
pm list <linux-pm@...ts.linux-foundation.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Arve Hjønnevåg <arve@...roid.com>,
Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>,
Nigel Cunningham <nigel@...el.suspend2.net>,
mark gross <mgross@...ux.intel.com>,
Uli Luckas <u.luckas@...d.de>,
Igor Stoppa <igor.stoppa@...ia.com>,
Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFD] Automatic suspend
On Wed, Feb 18, 2009 at 09:48:04AM -0800, Jesse Barnes wrote:
> I think "powernag" would be a better name, and it would probably work pretty
> well. Users would be notified that certain apps should probably be shut down
> while they're on battery, and nag the authors to fix it.
How do you usefully tell the difference between an application that's
waking up a lot because it's dumb and an application that's waking up a
lot because it's doing something useful? One downside of powertop is
that it's resulted in a lot of "How do I reduce the number of wakeups
caused by i8042 whenever I use the mouse"-type questions. We don't want
innocent app writers to be hit by this kind of thing.
--
Matthew Garrett | mjg59@...f.ucam.org
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists