[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090218183808.GE25719@amt.cnet>
Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2009 15:38:08 -0300
From: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@...hat.com>
To: Joerg Roedel <joerg.roedel@....com>
Cc: Avi Kivity <avi@...hat.com>, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] kvm mmu: remove redundant check in mmu_set_spte
The following code flow is unnecessary:
if (largepage)
was_rmapped = is_large_pte(*shadow_pte);
else
was_rmapped = 1;
The is_large_pte() function will always evaluate to one here because the
(largepage && !is_large_pte) case is already handled in the first
if-clause. So we can remove this check and set was_rmapped to one always
here.
Signed-off-by: Joerg Roedel <joerg.roedel@....com>
Acked-by: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@...hat.com>
---
arch/x86/kvm/mmu.c | 8 ++------
1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu.c b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu.c
index ef060ec..c90b4b2 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu.c
@@ -1791,12 +1791,8 @@ static void mmu_set_spte(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 *shadow_pte,
pgprintk("hfn old %lx new %lx\n",
spte_to_pfn(*shadow_pte), pfn);
rmap_remove(vcpu->kvm, shadow_pte);
- } else {
- if (largepage)
- was_rmapped = is_large_pte(*shadow_pte);
- else
- was_rmapped = 1;
- }
+ } else
+ was_rmapped = 1;
}
if (set_spte(vcpu, shadow_pte, pte_access, user_fault, write_fault,
dirty, largepage, global, gfn, pfn, speculative, true)) {
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists