[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <499C670F.9090203@zytor.com>
Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2009 11:52:47 -0800
From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
To: Alain Knaff <alain@...ff.lu>
CC: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@...ozas.de>,
the arch/x86 maintainers <x86@...nel.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: tip: bzip2/lzma now in tip:x86/setup-lzma
Alain Knaff wrote:
>
> Maybe another solution would be to make the choice of builtin ramdisk
> compression user-selectable, and default to no compression at all.
>
That might just make most sense.
> Indeed, in the default case, the builtin ramdisk is so small (950 bytes
> uncompressed), that it probably wouldn't really matter anyways.
>
> The only case where it matters is for developers of embedded systems who
> want to replace the builtin ramdisk with a fully populated one, because
> their boot loader does not support loading a "normal" initrd.
>
> These people are (hopefully) knowledgeable enough to pick an appropriate
> compressor (but there's still the issue of notifying them about the
> change, obviously).
>
> Btw, what *is* the standard work flow of supplying your own built-in
> initramfs? Do such developers usually supply a directory tree, or do
> they already cpio it before supplying it to the kernel? Or do they even
> compress it themselves?
The normal thing is that you point the kernel build to an
out-of-the-kernel-build-tree directory.
-hpa
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists