[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <499C681A.6000008@hp.com>
Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2009 14:57:14 -0500
From: Brian Haley <brian.haley@...com>
To: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
YOSHIFUJI Hideaki <yoshfuji@...ux-ipv6.org>
CC: Vlad Yasevich <vladislav.yasevich@...com>,
Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@...cle.com>,
Theodore Tso <tytso@....edu>, Valdis.Kletnieks@...edu,
arvidjaar@...l.ru, rjw@...k.pl, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
bonding-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net, jamagallon@....com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: 2.6.29 regression? Bonding tied to IPV6 in 29-rc5
Vlad Yasevich wrote:
> Having worked in other environments where ipv6 has to be explicitly
> enabled per interface, I've thought that this level of control was
> always missing from linux. Being able to configure only the interface
> that users want seems like a good thing to have.
> Would a module parameter that disables ipv6 or at least addrconf be
> enough of a solution?
There does seem to be a sysctl for it, just doesn't seem to work.
Possible patch below.
This actually brings up the issue that the "all" ipv6 sysctl, for
example net.ipv6.conf.all.disable_ipv6, doesn't actually do anything (at
least it didn't seem to for me). Maybe it's time to fix that too to be
like IPv4, things like IN_DEV_RPFILTER() and friends aren't looking so
bad...
I tested this patch on lo and a few Ethernet devices and saw no IPv6
addresses. Don't know if EPERM is the right errno since we don't know
if the user set this or DAD failed.
The disable_ipv6 knob was meant to be used for the kernel to disable
IPv6 on an interface when DAD failed for the link-local address based on
the MAC, but we should also be able to administratively disable it on an
interface, or the entire system. This patch fixes the per-interface
problem.
Signed-off-by: Brian Haley <brian.haley@...com>
View attachment "noipv6.patch" of type "text/x-diff" (422 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists