linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/9] Make lazy mmu update mode pre-empt safe

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <499C8F0C.40202@goop.org>
Date:	Wed, 18 Feb 2009 14:43:24 -0800
From:	Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@...p.org>
To:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
CC:	mingo@...e.hu, x86@...nel.org, xen-devel@...ts.xensource.com,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, peterz@...radead.org,
	npiggin@...e.de, tglx@...utronix.de, rusty@...tcorp.com.au,
	zach@...are.com, akataria@...are.com, avi@...hat.com,
	mtosatti@...hat.com, jeremy.fitzhardinge@...rix.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/9] Make lazy mmu update mode pre-empt safe

Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Wed, 18 Feb 2009 14:30:10 -0800
> Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@...p.org> wrote:
>
>   
>> This series changes the paravirt-ops lazy update modes in the following ways:
>>     
>
> glumph.  This doesn't look like a 2.6.29 quickfix.
>   

You mean for apply_to_page_range?  No, definitely not, but I don't think 
it has any users wanting to operate on init_mm in 2.6.29.

    J

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/