[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090218024312.GA14848@lixom.net>
Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2009 20:43:12 -0600
From: Olof Johansson <olof@...om.net>
To: dayu@...angmobile.cn
Cc: leoli@...escale.com, galak@...nel.crashing.org,
linuxppc-dev@...abs.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] fix the interrupt loss problem on powerpc IPIC
(2.6.25-2.6.28)
On Wed, Feb 18, 2009 at 10:16:07AM +0800, dayu@...angmobile.cn wrote:
> From: Da Yu <dayu@...angmobile.cn>
> Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2009 19:58:20 +0800
> Subject: [PATCH] fix the interrupt loss problem on powerpc IPIC (2.6.25-2.6.28)
>
> Signed-off-by: Da Yu <dayu@...angmobile.cn>
Still no proper explanation in the patch.
Also, with this change, is 'temp' really needed, or can you just pass in the
mask by hand?
-Olof
> ---
>
> --- a/arch/powerpc/sysdev/ipic.c 2009-02-18 09:47:04.000000000 +0800
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/sysdev/ipic.c 2009-02-18 09:46:34.000000000 +0800
> @@ -568,8 +568,7 @@ static void ipic_ack_irq(unsigned int vi
>
> spin_lock_irqsave(&ipic_lock, flags);
>
> - temp = ipic_read(ipic->regs, ipic_info[src].ack);
> - temp |= (1 << (31 - ipic_info[src].bit));
> + temp = 1 << (31 - ipic_info[src].bit);
> ipic_write(ipic->regs, ipic_info[src].ack, temp);
>
> /* mb() can't guarantee that ack is finished. But it does finish
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists