lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090217125021.GA2403@yzhao-otc.sh.intel.com>
Date:	Tue, 17 Feb 2009 20:50:21 +0800
From:	Yu Zhao <yu.zhao@...el.com>
To:	greg@...ah.com
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 6/7] PCI: document SR-IOV sysfs entries

Hi Greg,

The `struct device' is preferred over the `struct kobject' in all cases
that create subdirectory in sysfs, is this true?

I'd like to create a subdirectory under PCI device sysfs directory and
put some symbol links into that directory (only symbol links). Should I
use `device' or `kobject'? Currently I use `device' and get two extra
file/directory (uevent and power) which look like useless for my case
because this subdirectory doesn't reflect a real device.

I checked some code and found they use kobject_init_and_add(). Should
I use it instead, or keep using the `device'?

Please advise.

Regards,
Yu

On Mon, Feb 16, 2009 at 09:28:39PM +0800, Zhao, Yu wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Yu Zhao <yu.zhao@...el.com>
> ---
>  Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-bus-pci |   27 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  1 files changed, 27 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-bus-pci b/Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-bus-pci
> index ceddcff..84dc100 100644
> --- a/Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-bus-pci
> +++ b/Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-bus-pci
> @@ -9,3 +9,30 @@ Description:
>  		that some devices may have malformatted data.  If the
>  		underlying VPD has a writable section then the
>  		corresponding section of this file will be writable.
> +
> +What:		/sys/bus/pci/devices/.../virtfn/N
> +Date:		February 2009
> +Contact:	Yu Zhao <yu.zhao@...el.com>
> +Description:
> +		This symbol link appears when hardware supports SR-IOV
> +		capability and Physical Function driver has enabled it.
> +		The symbol link points to the PCI device sysfs entry of
> +		Virtual Function whose index is N (0...MaxVFs-1).
> +
> +What:		/sys/bus/pci/devices/.../virtfn/dep_link
> +Date:		February 2009
> +Contact:	Yu Zhao <yu.zhao@...el.com>
> +Description:
> +		This symbol link appears when hardware supports SR-IOV
> +		capability and Physical Function driver has enabled it,
> +		and this device has vendor specific dependencies with
> +		others. The symbol link points to the PCI device sysfs
> +		entry of Physical Function this device depends on.
> +
> +What:		/sys/bus/pci/devices/.../physfn
> +Date:		February 2009
> +Contact:	Yu Zhao <yu.zhao@...el.com>
> +Description:
> +		This symbol link appears when a device is Virtual Function.
> +		The symbol link points to the PCI device sysfs entry of
> +		Physical Function this device associates with.
> -- 
> 1.5.6.4
> 
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ