[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090219092348.GD2354@elte.hu>
Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2009 10:23:48 +0100
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Frédéric Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH][git pull] tracing: limit the number of loops the ring
buffer self test can make
* Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org> wrote:
> Ingo,
>
> I added one more fix. Thinking about the solution, although
> the disabling of the ring buffer is good enough to prevent the
> bug you hit. I became worried about a corrupted ring buffer
> that can cause an inifinite loop. This patch adds a fix for
> that too.
yes, that's a good idea too:
> @@ -23,10 +23,20 @@ static int trace_test_buffer_cpu(struct trace_array *tr, int cpu)
> {
> struct ring_buffer_event *event;
> struct trace_entry *entry;
> + unsigned int loops = 0;
>
> while ((event = ring_buffer_consume(tr->buffer, cpu, NULL))) {
> entry = ring_buffer_event_data(event);
>
> + /*
> + * The ring buffer is a size of trace_buf_size, if
> + * we loop more than the size, there's something wrong
> + * with the ring buffer.
> + */
> + if (loops++ > trace_buf_size) {
> + printk(KERN_CONT ".. bad ring buffer ");
> + goto failed;
> + }
Would be nice to also emit a WARN_ONCE() message about the test
failure, to make sure automated tests like mine pick even
soft-failures up.
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists