[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090219112212.GQ2354@elte.hu>
Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2009 12:22:12 +0100
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mutex: enable spinning for DEBUG_MUTEX
* Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org> wrote:
> Subject: mutex: enable spinning for DEBUG_MUTEX
> From: Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>
> Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2009 15:57:38 +0100
>
> Spinning with CONFIG_DEBUG_MUTEX is possible but care must be taken
> with the debug checks vs. racy access to the lock owner field.
>
> In the case where the lock owner gets rescheduled after acquisition
> and therefor unlocks on another CPU, that second CPU might not see the
> write of the owner field from the first CPU and we warn about owner
> mismatch. Thus the memory barriers for the debug case.
>
> Also remove the redundant mutex_set_owner()s in __mutex_lock_common()
> and __mutex_trylock_slowpath(), it's taken care of in mutex_lock() and
> mutex_trylock().
>
> [a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl: fix _nested variants]
> Signed-off-by: Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>
> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
> ---
> kernel/mutex-debug.c | 6 ++++++
> kernel/mutex-debug.h | 6 ++++++
> kernel/mutex.c | 27 +++++++++++++++------------
> 3 files changed, 27 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
Applied to tip:core/locking, thanks Peter!
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists