[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1235004837.6951.6.camel@bodhitayantram.eng.vmware.com>
Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2009 16:53:57 -0800
From: Zachary Amsden <zach@...are.com>
To: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@...p.org>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
the arch/x86 maintainers <x86@...nel.org>,
Xen-devel <xen-devel@...ts.xensource.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Nick Piggin <npiggin@...e.de>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>,
Alok Kataria <akataria@...are.com>,
Avi Kivity <avi@...hat.com>,
Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@...hat.com>,
Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy.fitzhardinge@...rix.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/9] x86/paravirt: remove lazy mode in interrupts
On Wed, 2009-02-18 at 14:30 -0800, Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote:
> From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy.fitzhardinge@...rix.com>
>
> Make paravirt_lazy_mode() always return PARAVIRT_LAZY_NONE
> when in an interrupt. This prevents interrupt code from
> accidentally inheriting an outer lazy state, and instead
> does everything synchronously. Outer batched operations
> are left deferred.
This looks like a good solution, but can you make paravirt_lazy_mode()
inline? It doesn't need to be a function call.
Zach
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists