linux-kernel - Re: [Bug #12667] Badness at kernel/time/timekeeping.c:98 in pmud (timekeeping

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <200902191400.53528.rjw@sisk.pl>
Date:	Thu, 19 Feb 2009 14:00:52 +0100
From:	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>
To:	Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>
Cc:	Paul Collins <paul@...ly.ondioline.org>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Kernel Testers List <kernel-testers@...r.kernel.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Subject: Re: [Bug #12667] Badness at kernel/time/timekeeping.c:98 in pmud (timekeeping_suspended)

On Thursday 19 February 2009, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> On Thu, 2009-02-19 at 21:27 +1300, Paul Collins wrote:
> > > Just for laughs I slapped together the following, which seems to do
> > the
> > > job, although not especially tidily.
> > 
> > And it doesn't even do the job.  Judging by this new trace, submitting
> > input events from the via-pmu resume function is still too early.
> > 
> What's up Thomas ? We can't call gettimeofday() from a sysdev
> suspend/resume ? That's a little bit too harsh no ?

Perhaps the ordering is wrong (ie. via-pmu resume happens bevore timekeeping
resume)?

Rafael
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/