linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] drm: Take mmap_sem up front to avoid lock order violations.

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 19 Feb 2009 10:21:16 -0500
From:	Kristian Høgsberg <krh@...hat.com>
To:	Nick Piggin <npiggin@...e.de>
Cc:	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>, krh@...planet.net,
	eric@...olt.net, Wang Chen <wangchen@...fujitsu.com>,
	dri-devel@...ts.sf.net, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Hugh Dickins <hugh@...itas.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm: Take mmap_sem up front to avoid lock order
 violations.

On Thu, 2009-02-19 at 16:17 +0100, Nick Piggin wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 19, 2009 at 09:49:40AM -0500, Kristian Høgsberg wrote:
> > 
> > > Secondly, mmap_sem is not a recursive lock (very few kernel locks are,
> > > and we generally frown upon recursive locking schemes), this means that
> > > the fault handler still cannot function properly.
> > 
> > I understand, but we take it twice only as a read lock, so that should
> > work, right?  We prevent the deadlock the lockdep validator warned about
> > and as far as I can see, the patch doesn't introduce a new one.  But
> > other than that I agree with the frowning on recursive locking, it's too
> > often used to paper over badly thought out locking.
> 
> It doesn't work. rwsems are fair (otherwise there is terrible starvation
> properties), so if another process does an interleaved down_write, then
> the 2nd down_read will block until the down_write is serviced.

Ooh, right, yes of course, ouch.

thanks,
Kristian


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/