[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090219185154.GA24117@infradead.org>
Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2009 13:51:54 -0500
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
To: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Cc: Atsushi Tsuji <a-tsuji@...jp.nec.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Jason Baron <jbaron@...hat.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Mathieu Desnoyers <compudj@...stal.dyndns.org>,
"Frank Ch. Eigler" <fche@...hat.com>,
Kazuto Miyoshi <miyoshi@...ux.bs1.fc.nec.co.jp>,
linux-mm <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Nick Piggin <nickpiggin@...oo.com.au>,
Hugh Dickins <hugh@...itas.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Add tracepoints to track pagecache transition
On Tue, Feb 17, 2009 at 10:24:46AM -0500, Steven Rostedt wrote:
>
> On Tue, 17 Feb 2009, Atsushi Tsuji wrote:
> > >
> > > This is rather asymmetric, why don't we care about the offset for the
> > > removed page?
> > >
> >
> > Indeed.
> > I added the offset to the argument for the removed page and resend fixed patch.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Atsushi Tsuji <a-tsuji@...jp.nec.com>
>
> Could you package it up in one patch again and resend with [PATCH v2].
> Also make sure to Cc the memory folks, and ask for an Acked-by from them.
Well, until we actually get a consumer of those tracepoints, e.g. a
ftrace pluging into the tree strong NACK for me.
(p.s. I really don't get it why people keep trying to push dead code
into the tree)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists