linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] pcie_portdriver: FIX: pcie_port_device

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <200902192247.46370.rjw@sisk.pl>
Date:	Thu, 19 Feb 2009 22:47:45 +0100
From:	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>
To:	"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>
Cc:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	jbarnes@...tuousgeek.org, linux-pci@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] pcie_portdriver: FIX: pcie_port_device_remove

On Thursday 19 February 2009, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
> Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org> writes:
> 
> >
> > There are large-scale and conflicting changes to this file in linux-next.
> >
> > If we want to jam this fix into 2.6.29 (and it looks like something we
> > want) then this will trash the linux-next changes.  It will cause me
> > grief, and will cause Stephen grief unless the pci tree is suitably
> > changed, which will cause Jesse grief. Either way: grief.
> 
> Ugh.
> 
> I had better have a good hard look at linux-next.  I tried to ask earlier about
> ongoing working but I didn't hear anything.

Yes, you did: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123342565225134&w=4

Thanks,
Rafael
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/