[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20090219152726.9551fb7a.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2009 15:27:26 -0800
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc: airlied@...ux.ie, benh@...nel.crashing.org,
dri-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm: Preserve SHMLBA bits in hash key for _DRM_SHM
mappings.
On Wed, 18 Feb 2009 15:41:02 -0800 (PST)
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net> wrote:
>
> Platforms such as sparc64 have D-cache aliasing issues. We
> cannot allow virtual mappings in different contexts to be such
> that two cache lines can be loaded for the same backing data.
> Updates to one cache line won't be seen by accesses to the other
> cache line.
>
> Code in sparc64 and other architectures solve this problem by
> making sure that all userland mappings of MAP_SHARED objects have
> the same virtual address base. They implement this by keying
> off of the page offset, and using that to choose a suitably
> consistent virtual address for mmap() requests.
>
> Making things even worse, getting this wrong on sparc64 can result
> in hangs during DRM lock acquisition. This is because, at least on
> UltraSPARC-III, normal loads consult the D-cache but atomics such
> as 'cas' (which is what cmpxchg() is implement using) only consult
> the L2 cache. So if a D-cache alias is inserted, the load can
> see different data than the atomic, and we'll loop forever because
> the atomic compare-and-exchange will never complete successfully.
>
> So to make this all work properly, we need to make sure that the
> hash address computed by drm_map_handle() preserves the SHMLBA
> relevant bits, and that's what this patch does for _DRM_SHM mappings.
>
> As a historical note, many years ago this bug didn't exist because we
> used to just use the low 32-bits of the address as the hash and just
> hope for the best. This preserved the SHMLBA bits properly. But when
> the hashtab code was added to DRM, this was no longer the case.
>
> ...
>
> #include <linux/vmalloc.h>
> +#include <linux/log2.h>
> +#include <asm/shmparam.h>
> #include "drmP.h"
>
The inclusion of asm/shmparam.h direct from a driver is a bit risky.
It assumes that asm/shmparam.h is compileable in isolation from the
additional things which include/linux/shm.h includes. In particular,
asm/page.h.
eg:
arch/xtensa/include/asm/shmparam.h
#define SHMLBA ((PAGE_SIZE > DCACHE_WAY_SIZE)? PAGE_SIZE : DCACHE_WAY_SIZE)
But including linux/shm.h here seems a bit silly. We'll see..
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists