[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090220080246.GA28669@elte.hu>
Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2009 09:02:46 +0100
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Huang Ying <ying.huang@...el.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>,
Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>,
Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...ymtl.ca>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH, v2] x86: use the right protections for split-up
pagetables
* Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu> wrote:
> [ Huang Ying also experienced problems in this area when writing
> the EFI code, but the real bug in split_large_page() was not
> realized back then. ]
> - * On Intel the NX bit of all levels must be cleared to make a
> - * page executable. See section 4.13.2 of Intel 64 and IA-32
> - * Architectures Software Developer's Manual).
Hm, in hindsight, we should have noticed this bug sooner - when
the NX comment above was added. There's never any good reason to
play protection games with higher-level pagetable entries. We
dont do it to user-space pagetables either - we just populate
them to _PAGE_TABLE and that's it.
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists