lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090220083528.GB24555@elte.hu>
Date:	Fri, 20 Feb 2009 09:35:28 +0100
From:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To:	Suresh Siddha <suresh.b.siddha@...el.com>
Cc:	Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	gleb@...hat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86: enable x2apic early at the first point


* Suresh Siddha <suresh.b.siddha@...el.com> wrote:

> On Thu, 2009-02-19 at 14:42 -0800, Yinghai Lu wrote:
> > Ingo want to decouple that x2apic and intr_remapping.
> > it seems it does work with x2apic without intr_remapping in one of setup.
> 
> x2apic with out intr-remapping is not architectural. Even when 
> we have < 255 logical cpu's, logical x2apic id's will be 
> greater than 16 bits even on a single/two socket systems and 
> this will break interrupt delivery. Please look at the x2apic 
> logical destination mode definition in the SDM (Section 
> 9.7.2.3 and 9.7.2.4 in my copy of SDM Vol3a)
> 
> While it might work in certain configurations (for example, 
> physical mode with < 8 bit apicids), it is not architectural 
> and implementation dependent, which may break in future 
> generations.
> 
> And also, logical x2apic mode has more advantages compared to 
> physical mode (like using lowest priority delivery mode etc).
> 
> I will post couple of patches, which revert's Gleb's patch and 
> another fix for the early boot failure issue, tomorrow.

Instead of the revert, we can zap this patch from tip:x86/apic:

  d13d2c3: x86, apic: decouple x2apic from interrupt remapping

But it will all need more cleanups. For example the mandatory 
coupling between x2apic and intr-remap is not clearly spelled 
out.

Also, some of the code has also become rather ugly. For example 
could you please work on eliminating this #ifdef-fest:

earth4:~/tip> grep INTR_REMAP arch/x86/kernel/apic/io_apic.c 
#ifdef CONFIG_INTR_REMAP
#ifdef CONFIG_INTR_REMAP
#ifdef CONFIG_INTR_REMAP
#ifdef CONFIG_INTR_REMAP
#ifdef CONFIG_INTR_REMAP
#ifdef CONFIG_INTR_REMAP
#ifdef CONFIG_INTR_REMAP
#ifdef CONFIG_INTR_REMAP
#ifdef CONFIG_INTR_REMAP
#ifdef CONFIG_INTR_REMAP
#ifdef CONFIG_INTR_REMAP
#ifdef CONFIG_INTR_REMAP
#ifdef CONFIG_INTR_REMAP
#ifdef CONFIG_INTR_REMAP
#ifdef CONFIG_INTR_REMAP
#ifdef CONFIG_INTR_REMAP
#ifdef CONFIG_INTR_REMAP
#ifdef CONFIG_INTR_REMAP
#ifdef CONFIG_INTR_REMAP

for example all the #ifdefs around irq_remapped() look bogus to 
me - dmar.h already defines irq_remapped() to always-0 when 
!CONFIG_INTR_REMAP.

	Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ