[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090220110651.GH28581@elte.hu>
Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2009 12:06:51 +0100
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To: Gleb Natapov <gleb@...hat.com>
Cc: Suresh Siddha <suresh.b.siddha@...el.com>,
Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86: enable x2apic early at the first point
* Gleb Natapov <gleb@...hat.com> wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 20, 2009 at 10:41:23AM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> >
> > * Gleb Natapov <gleb@...hat.com> wrote:
> >
> > > > > I will post couple of patches, which revert's Gleb's patch
> > > > > and another fix for the early boot failure issue,
> > > > > tomorrow.
> > >
> > > If you'll revert my patch it will not be possible to use
> > > x2apic in KVM (at least without KVM implementing interrupt
> > > remapping which is unneeded otherwise) and x2apic interface is
> > > much better for vitalization. Instead of reverting the patch
> > > it will be better to add check if x2apic can be used without
> > > intr-remmaping (all CPUs belong to cluster 0) or allow
> > > enabling of x2apic without IR if running as a guest.
> >
> > yep, that would be required - because your patch can break real
> > systems right now. Mind sending me a fix for it?
> >
> > I've applied Yinghai's fix as well, so please base it on latest
> > tip:master.
> >
> OK. Will send next week.
ok, that's too long of a breakage window - i'll revert it then,
please send a new version once you have it.
Thanks,
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists