[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1235139492.29813.53.camel@penberg-laptop>
Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2009 16:18:12 +0200
From: Pekka Enberg <penberg@...helsinki.fi>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Cc: Vegard Nossum <vegard.nossum@...il.com>, stable@...nel.org,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Nick Piggin <npiggin@...e.de>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm: fix lazy vmap purging (use-after-free error)
On Fri, 2009-02-20 at 15:01 +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> * Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu> wrote:
>
> > ah, indeed:
> >
> > list_del_rcu(&va->list);
> >
> > i suspect it could be hit big time in a workload that opens
> > more than 512 files, as expand_files() uses a
> > vmalloc()+vfree() pair in that case.
>
> hm, perhaps it's not a problem after all. The freeing is done
> via rcu, and list_del_rcu() leaves the forward pointer intact.
>
> So how did it happen that the entry got kfree()d before the loop
> was done? We are in a spinlocked section so the CPU should not
> have entered rcu processing.
RCU. Lets CC Paul.
Looking at it, Documentation/RCU/checklist.txt states that:
7. If the updater uses call_rcu(), then the corresponding readers
must use rcu_read_lock() and rcu_read_unlock().
which we don't do for this loop. I fail to see how it could be a
kmemcheck false positive, so it's probably a real bug.
Pekka
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists