[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090220160737.GC11294@elte.hu>
Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2009 17:07:37 +0100
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To: Vaidyanathan Srinivasan <svaidy@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-pm@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl, ego@...ibm.com, tglx@...utronix.de,
andi@...stfloor.org, venkatesh.pallipadi@...el.com,
vatsa@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, arjan@...radead.org,
arun@...ux.vnet.ibm.com,
Vaidyanathan Srinivasan <svaidy@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Suresh Siddha <suresh.b.siddha@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 0/4] timers: framework for migration between CPU
* Vaidyanathan Srinivasan <svaidy@...ux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
> > I'd also suggest to not do that rather ugly
> > enable_timer_migration per-cpu variable, but simply reuse
> > the existing nohz.load_balancer as a target CPU.
>
> This is a good idea to automatically bias the timers. But
> this nohz.load_balancer is a very fast moving target and we
> will need some heuristics to estimate overall system idleness
> before moving the timers.
>
> I would agree that the power saving load balancer has a good
> view of the system and can potentially guide the timer biasing
> framework.
Yeah, it's a fast moving target, but it already concentrates
the load somewhat.
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists