linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] cpufreq: Change link order of x86 cpufreq modules

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <1235150992.6467.66.camel@quest>
Date:	Fri, 20 Feb 2009 17:29:52 +0000
From:	Scott James Remnant <scott@...onical.com>
To:	Matthew Garrett <mjg59@...f.ucam.org>
Cc:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, davej@...emonkey.org.uk,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, cpufreq@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] cpufreq: Change link order of x86 cpufreq modules

On Wed, 2009-02-18 at 18:36 +0000, Matthew Garrett wrote:

> On Wed, Feb 18, 2009 at 07:31:37PM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> 
> > Nice fix! Where does this information come from? Distro module 
> > ordering magic? It's rather non-trivial.
> 
> Pretty much. p4-clockmod is never the preferred option because it does 
> no voltage scaling. speedstep-centrino is now almost entirely 
> functionally replaced with acpi-cpufreq. The powernow-k8 issue was a 
> personal communication from davej.
> 
In fact, we've noticed severe regressions with p4-clockmod over simply
having no scaling driver at all - and are not going to built it into our
kernels.

Scott
-- 
Scott James Remnant
scott@...onical.com

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (198 bytes)