[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <3e8340490902200953p704fd9dbuff0a7a890895ea23@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2009 12:53:39 -0500
From: Bryan Donlan <bdonlan@...il.com>
To: linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: sct@...hat.com, akpm@...ux-foundation.org, adilger@....com,
tytso@....edu, Bryan Donlan <bdonlan@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] ext[234]: Return -EIO not -ESTALE on directory
traversal through deleted inode
On Mon, Feb 16, 2009 at 8:10 PM, Bryan Donlan <bdonlan@...il.com> wrote:
> + if (unlikely(IS_ERR(inode))) {
> + if (PTR_ERR(inode) == -ESTALE) {
> + ext3_error(dir->i_sb, "ext2_lookup",
> + "deleted inode referenced: %lu",
> + ino);
> + return ERR_PTR(-EIO);
> + } else {
> + return ERR_CAST(inode);
> + }
> + }
I just noticed that I forgot to edit the function name in the
ext3_error and ext4_error invocations... Would it be better to send a
delta to fix this or resubmit the whole thing?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists