[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090220182213.GA1681@ucw.cz>
Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2009 19:22:15 +0100
From: Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>
To: Matthew Garrett <mjg59@...f.ucam.org>
Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>,
Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>,
"Woodruff, Richard" <r-woodruff2@...com>,
Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>,
Kyle Moffett <kyle@...fetthome.net>,
Oliver Neukum <oliver@...kum.org>,
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
pm list <linux-pm@...ts.linux-foundation.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Arve Hj?nnev?g <arve@...roid.com>,
Nigel Cunningham <nigel@...el.suspend2.net>,
mark gross <mgross@...ux.intel.com>,
Uli Luckas <u.luckas@...d.de>,
Igor Stoppa <igor.stoppa@...ia.com>,
Brian Swetland <swetland@...gle.com>,
Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFD] Automatic suspend
On Mon 2009-02-16 23:23:30, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 17, 2009 at 12:19:38AM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>
> > This, again, seems to be a bit x86-centric. :-) The Android people are telling
> > us that on the hardware they deal with it does make sense to put the entire
> > system to sleep even for relatively short periods of time, since the latencies
> > involved are not too bad.
>
> Arve said that the power state was equivalent in idle and suspend, but
...for Arve's hardware. Not all embedded systems are like that, and
OLPC / PCs are definitely not like that.
Pavel
--
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists