linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] fs/cifs: send SMB_COM_FLUSH in cifs

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <524f69650902201255j60d3074fkc458987c5fc56e9d@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Fri, 20 Feb 2009 14:55:44 -0600
From:	Steve French <smfrench@...il.com>
To:	Horst Reiterer <horst.reiterer@...il.com>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-cifs-client@...ts.samba.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] fs/cifs: send SMB_COM_FLUSH in cifs_fsync

On Fri, Feb 20, 2009 at 2:51 PM, Horst Reiterer
<horst.reiterer@...il.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> In contrast to the now-obsolete smbfs, cifs does not send SMB_COM_FLUSH
> in response to an explicit fsync(2) to guarantee that all volatile data
> is written to stable storage on the server side, provided the server
> honors the request (which, to my knowledge, is true for Windows and
> Samba with 'strict sync' enabled).
> This patch modifies the cifs_fsync implementation to restore the

Patch seems reasonable at first glance.  Will take a look in more
detail this weekend.



-- 
Thanks,

Steve
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/