[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.1.10.0902192107230.31658@gandalf.stny.rr.com>
Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2009 21:08:42 -0500 (EST)
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>,
Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>,
Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...ymtl.ca>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
Subject: Re: [git pull] changes for tip, and a nasty x86 page table bug
On Thu, 19 Feb 2009, Linus Torvalds wrote:
>
>
> On Thu, 19 Feb 2009, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> >
> > In doing this change, I stumbled upon a nasty bug in the page handling
> > of the x86 code, where we can fall into a state where the PTE
> > has the RW bit set, but the PMD does not.
>
> How do we ever have a PMD that is read-only? That sounds like a bug to
> begin with. There's no reason to ever do that.
Patch 2/6 explains how this happened, and supplies the fix.
>
> In fact, it should trigger the pmd_bad() tests if it ever happens,
> wouldn't it? We want all the _KERNPG_TABLE bits to always be set, no?
I'm not sure what would do a pmd_bad check.
-- Steve
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists